Agincourt by Juliet Barker Page B

restored”: ibid., pp. 54-5. For de Gaucourt’s later mission, see below, pp. 353-4. (back to text)
    21
GHQ
, pp. 58-9. (back to text)
    22Ibid.; Capgrave, p. 131; Elmham, “Liber Metricus,” p. 113. (back to text)
    23
Memorials of London and London Life
, p. 619;
Letter-Books
, i, p. 159;
Forty-Fourth Annual Report
, p. 576. (back to text)
    24Devon, pp. 341-2;
Foedera
, ix, p. 314;
CPR
, p. 364;
CCR
, p. 236. (back to text)
    25W&W, ii, pp. 64, 65 n. 3. For Curteys, see above, p. 97. For wages paid to masters of ships from Hull, King’s Lynn, Winchelsea and London, for service from 1 August see
Foedera
, ix, pp. 315-17. (back to text)
    26GHQ, pp. 58-9. Curry,
Agincourt: A New History
, p. 131, rightly observes that one cannot simply count names to ascertain the reduction in fighting strength of the army as some of those sent home were non-combatants, but the incomplete nature of the records of the sick and the identifiable losses to some companies do not support her conclusion that Henry V still had “at least” 8680 soldiers (“a minimum” 8732, p. 187) with him on his march to Calais. (back to text)
    27W&W, ii, p. 66 n. 5, 67-8;
ODNB
;
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem
, nos 654-71; MS Mowbray fo. 23. The medicines were all supplied in October 1415. For Arundel, see above, pp. 20, 33-4, 45. (back to text)
    28W&W, ii, pp. 45-6;
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem
, nos 302-5, 359-69, 441-51, 452-9, 460-1, 654-71. William Botiller, lord of Warrington, died on 26 September; Sir John Southworth on 5 October:
Abstracts of Inquisitions Post Mortem, made by Christopher Towneley and Roger Dodsworth
, ed. by William Langton (Chetham Society, Manchester, 1875), pp. 112-14, 117. (back to text)
    29Wylie, “Notes on the Agincourt Roll,” p. 136; W&W, i, p. 3 n. 10; ii, p. 46 n. 6;
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem
, nos 359-69. Ken Mourin, “Norwich, Norfolk and Sir Thomas Erpingham,” in Curry,
Agincourt 1415
, pp. 80-1. (back to text)
    30Monstrelet, iii, p. 85. (back to text)
    31W&W, ii, p. 67 and n. 7; Wylie, “Notes on the Agincourt Roll,” pp. 131-2, 139; MS E101/47/29, TNA. (back to text)
    32
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: 1413-1418
, no. 343;
GHQ
, pp. 58-9. (back to text)
    33Wylie, “Notes on the Agincourt Roll,” pp. 128, 130; Allmand,
Henry V
, p. 212. (back to text)
    34Wylie, “Notes on the Agincourt Roll,” p. 112 n. 1;
Forty-Fourth Annual Report
, p. 577; Anthony Smith, “‘The Greatest Man of That Age’: The Acquisition of Sir John Fastolf’s East Anglian Estates,” in Archer and Walker (eds),
Rulers and Ruled
, pp. 137-8. (back to text)
    35
GHQ
, pp. 58-9; W&W, ii, p. 62 n. 8; Devon, pp. 345, 349. (back to text)
    36Curry, p. 445;
Registres de la Jurade
, p. 257. (back to text)
    37
GHQ
, pp. 58-9. Some of the ships had been released after six weeks’ service: that is, on 12 September, ten days before the capitulation of Harfleur. See, for example,
Foedera
, ix, p. 315. (back to text)
    CHAPTER TWELVE: THE MARCH TO CALAIS
    1
GHQ
, p. 60. (back to text)
    2
GHQ
, p. 58 n. 5; le Févre, i, p. 229;
First English Life
, pp. 42-3; Curry, pp. 429-30; Bacquet, p. 110. (back to text)
    3
GHQ
, p. 61. For Fusoris, see above, pp. 122-3, 164-5. (back to text)
    4See above, p. 33. (back to text)
    5Pizan,
BDAC
, pp. 37-8. (back to text)
    6Ibid., p. 38 n. 50. (back to text)
    7Norbert Ohler,
The Medieval Traveller
, trans. by Caroline Hillier (Boydell Press, Woodbridge, 1989), p. 98; Pizan,
BDAC
, p. 50 n. 72. The English chaplain (
GHQ
, pp. 60-1) believed that Calais was only 100 miles away (it was actually 150 miles away), but his mistake was not shared by the king. (back to text)
    8
GHQ
, p. 61. (back to text)
    9W&W, ii, p. 88 n. 3;
St Albans
, p. 93; Elmham, “Liber Metricus,” p. 114;
GHQ
, pp. 60-1. Those French chroniclers who attempted to give a date generally referred to “the first week in October”: see, for example, Cagny,
Chroniques
, p. 97. (back to text)
    10C. R. Cheney (ed),
Handbook