agree?â
âIf that is the case, is it not tragic to be a writer?â
âIf there is something tragic about the situation, that is certainly not the reason. It is beneficial not to be read. You can write whatever you like.â
âBut in the beginning, someone must have read you, otherwise you would not have become famous.â
âIn the beginning, perhaps, a little bit.â
âWhich brings me back to my initial question: how do you explain your extraordinary success? Why did your early novels touch a nerve with readers?â
âI donât know. That was back in the 1930s. There was no television, people had to find something to keep busy.â
âYes, but why you, rather than another writer?â
âThe truth is, it was after the war that I began to be so successful. Which is amusing when you think about it, because I was in no way involved with that huge farce: I was already virtually a total invalid, and ten years earlier, I had been declared unfit for service because of my obesity. In 1945 the great expiation began: whether they were confused or not, people felt they had reasons to be ashamed. So when they happened upon my novels, which seemed to be screaming with imprecations and were overflowing with filth, they decided they had found a punishment commensurate with their own baseness.â
âAnd was it?â
âIt might have been. But it might have been something else, too. But there you are,
vox populi, vox dei
. And then very quickly they stopped reading me. As with Céline, moreover: Céline is probably one of the least read of all writers. The difference is that I wasnât being read for the right reasons, whereas he wasnât being read for the wrong reasons.â
âYou often refer to Céline.â
âI love literature, sir. Are you surprised?â
âYou do not expurgate him, I gather?â
âNo. Heâs the one who is constantly expurgating me.â
âHave you met him?â
âNo, Iâve done better than that: Iâve read him.â
âAnd has he read you?â
âCertainly. I could often sense as much when I was reading him.â
âYou think you have influenced Céline?â
âLess than he influenced me, but still.â
âAnd who else might you have influenced?â
âNo one, obviously, because no one else has read me. Although, thanks to Céline, I have been readâtruly readâat least once.â
âSo you see that you do want to be read.â
âBy him, only by him. I donât give a damn about other people.â
âHave you met other writers?â
âNo, I have met no one and no one has come to meet me. I know very few people: Gravelin, of course, and apart from him, the butcher, the milkman, the grocer, and the tobacconist. Thatâs all, I think. Oh yes, thereâs also that bitch of a nurse, and the journalists. I donât like to see people. If I live alone, itâs not so much because I love solitude but that I hate humankind. You can write in your rag that Iâm a filthy misanthropist.â
âWhy are you a misanthropist?â
âYou havenât read
Filthy People
, I suppose?â
âNo.â
âNaturally. If you had read it, you would know why. There are a thousand reasons to despise people. The most important one, for me, is their bad faith, which is incorrigible. Whatâs more, nowadays, this bad faith is more widespread than ever. You can well imagine that I have lived through a number of eras: nevertheless, I can assure you that never have I so despised an era the way I do this one. An era of full-blown bad faith. Bad faith is worse than disloyalty, duplicity, perfidy. If you are in bad faith, first of all you are lying to yourself, not because you are struggling with your conscience, but for your own syrupy self-satisfaction, using pretty names like âmodestyâ or
Lynsay Sands
Kevin Emerson
David Rosenfelt
Amber Garr
Don Pendleton
Rory Black
Tim Cody
Lynn Hagen
Siobhain Bunni
The Brothers Bulger: How They Terrorized, Corrupted Boston for a Quarter Century