turned off all the lights in the room and left on the computer monitor. It turns out itâs quite bright. You can see it dimly through the curtains even standing outside the room. If she really wanted to make it look like no one was home, she wouldâve turned off the computer.â
âMaybe she couldnât find the switch. People who arenât familiar with computers donât know about those kinds of things.â
âShe couldâve at least turned off the monitor. The switch is right there on the front. And if she didnât understand that, she couldâve pulled the cord.â
âI guess she forgot.â
Detective Kaga stared at me for a moment, then nodded. âThatâs probably it. She probably forgot.â
Having nothing else to say to that, I remained silent.
He stood, thanking me again for my time. âWill you be writing about today in your account as well?â
âI expect I will.â
âThen Iâll be able to read it?â
âFine by me.â
He headed toward the cash register, then stopped midway. âDid you really think I wasnât cut out to be a teacher?â
I remembered writing something along those lines in my account. âThatâs just my opinion.â
He looked down again, gave a brief sigh, and walked out.
I wondered what Kaga was thinking.
If heâd already figured out something about the case, I wondered why he didnât just tell me.
Â
2
SUSPICION
KYOICHIRO KAGAâS NOTES
Â
One of the things I took particular note of was the use of a paperweight as the murder weapon. I need hardly mention that the paperweight belonged to the late author and thus was in the office prior to the killing. This suggests that the killer didnât come to the house with the intent of killing Kunihiko Hidaka.
Had the murder been planned from the beginning, the murderer would have come prepared with a weapon. Itâs possible that such preparations had been made, but then unforeseen circumstances necessitated a change in plans, making a blow to the back of the head with the paperweight the next-best option. However, that seems rather poorly premeditated. It makes most sense that the murder was an impulsive act, done in the heat of the moment, with whatever implement was at hand.
This makes me wonder about the locked doors. According to the statements of the two who discovered the body, both the front door to the house and Kunihiko Hidakaâs home office door were locked.
Rie Hidaka had this to say:
âWhen I left the house just after five oâclock, I locked the front door. I was worried that, since he was in his office, my husband might not hear it if somebody walked in. Of course, I never imagined anyone actually would.â
According to forensics, only the Hidakasâ fingerprints were found on the front doorknob. There were no signs of gloves having been used, or fingerprints being wiped off. I think itâs safe to assume that the door was locked by Rie Hidaka when she left and it remained so until she opened it upon her return.
However, thereâs a high probability that the murderer locked the door to Mr. Hidakaâs home office from the inside. Unlike the front door, the office-door handle showed clear signs of having been wiped clean.
This leads me to believe that the murderer did, in fact, come in through the office window. However, this would seem to create a contradiction. If the murder wasnât premeditated, why come in through the window? Itâs highly unlikely that the intruder intended to steal anything. Even a thief seeing the house for the first time would soon realize there was nothing left worth stealing.
However, one line of conjecture resolves this contradiction. What if we assume that the killer visited the Hidaka household twice in the same day? The first time, the killer came in the front door as a guest. Then, after leaving the house (or, rather, pretending to leave),
Richard D. Mahoney
Jacqueline Rhoades
Robert A. Caro
Tim Akers
Caitlin Kerry
V.C. Andrews
Owen Carey Jones
Elise Whyles
Bee Rowlatt
Kate Hewitt