detail. Oh, yes, I think the museum will be pleased.â
âThatâs amazing,â said Toby. I could tell he was getting into it. âBut now how do you know there isnât still another painting underneath the one youâve removed?â
âI donât,â said Al, evidently content with himself. âThereâs a remote chance that thereâs even an earlier image under this one, but the risk of ruining the icon would be too great. Now that Iâve got an eighteenth-century panel with an eighteenth-century image, itâs time to stop.â
âSay you didnât stop. How would you know for sure youâve gone too far?â Toby persisted.
âWell, if you get down to the gessoâthatâs the primerâthen youâre in the crapper, because that means youâve gone and wiped out the original image. Goodbye, painting.â I was familiar with gesso. Itâs a white, chalky mixture that artists laid down on raw wood as a primer to create a smooth surface on which to paint. âOnce you expose the gesso,â Al went on, âthereâs no going back.â
Toby nodded soberly. âBut what if youâd found gesso underneath the layer you just removed? What would you tell the museum?â
Al raised his palms and contorted his features into an expression of mock horror, then confided with a grin, âThank God for tenure.â
Toby laughed. âI thought you didnât believe in God.â
âItâs just a saying. Besides, it never hurts to be polite.â Then Al looked at me, as if in warning. âBut seriously, folks, itâs a delicate business when youâre dealing with an older panel, because the question always is when to stop. In this situation I was pretty confident, but yes, thereâs an element of risk.â
âThat would be the case with ours, then, if we found it, wouldnât it?â I said.
âExactly,â agreed Al.
Toby picked up the thread. âIn our case, something you said earlier has been bothering me. If the same kind of supports were used in the nineteenth century as in the Renaissance, what makes you think our panel is any older than the nineteenth century?â
âIâll show you. Letâs take another look at your picture.â Toby handed Al the photo showing the reverse of the panel. âSee here?â Al asked, tracing his finger along the top horizontal wedge across the back. âThis wood is of a lighter color than the rest of the panel, which suggests that these wedges are replacements of the originals. The early icon makers hammered their wedges into place but didnât use glue, and eventually the strips became loose and fell out. You wouldnât expect to find replacements in a panel of more recent construction. So my guess is that your icon dates back at least to the 1600s, if not earlier.â
I was thinking hard. âI can see why itâs so important to examine the panels. But there was only one photo of the icon in Morganâs auction catalog, and the same was true of their catalog online. I checked. The picture was of the front of the icon, showing the angel. So how could anyone, say a prospective bidder, know what the back was like or that there was any reason to think this particular icon, listed with a low estimate at a secondary auction gallery, was much older and more valuable than its description?â
Al shrugged. âThey couldnât.â
Toby, who had been staring at the cleaned icon, looked up at me. âYouâre right. That would explain why there werenât lots of bidders. No one was interested.â
âWith two exceptions,â I pointed out. âCharlie.â I waited a beat.
Toby finished my sentence. âAnd whoever killed him.â
4
R OSE CASSINI , the consignor of the icon, had agreed to meet with us the next morning at her home in Cazadero. On the way, we stopped off in Duncans Mills so Toby
Adrian D Roberts
Hammond; Innes
Jeanne Grant
Mary Ann Scott
William Shatner
D. T. Max
Vicki Delany
Pip Baker, Jane Baker
Annemarie Hartnett
Upton Sinclair