discover when a work is to be taken as coming from this source and when from that. When discovering a work it would be — If it is poetry it means this and only this — and if it is prose it means that and only that. Anything else is a confusion, silly and bad practice.
I believe this is possible as I believe in the main that Marianne Moore is of all American writers most constantly a poet — not because her lines are invariably full of imagery they are not, they are often diagramatically informative, and not because sheclips her work into certain shapes — her pieces are without meter most often — but I believe she is most constantly a poet in her work because the purpose of her work is invariably from the source from which poetry starts — that it is constantly from the purpose of poetry. And that it actually possesses this characteristic, as of that origin, to a more distinguishable degree when it eschews verse rhythms than when it does not. It has the purpose of poetry written into and therefore it is poetry.
I believe it possible, even essential, that when poetry fails it does not become prose but bad poetry. The test of Mariane Moore would be that she writes sometimes good and sometimes bad poetry but always — with a single purpose out of a single fountain which is of the sort —
The practical point would be to discover —
I can go no further than to say that poetry feeds the imagination and prose the emotions, poetry liberates the words from their emotional implications, prose confirms them in it. Both move centrifugally or centripetally toward the intelligence.
Of course it must be understood that writing deals with words and words only and that alldiscussions of it deal with single words and their association in groups.
As far as I can discover there is no way but the one I have marked out which will satisfactorily deal with certain lines such as occur in some play of Shakespeare or in a poem of Marianne Moore’s, let us say: Tomorrow will be the first of April —
Certainly there is an emotional content in this for anyone living in the northern temperate zone, but whether it is prose or poetry — taken by itself — who is going to say unless some mark is put on it by the intent conveyed by the words which surround it —
Either to write or to comprehend poetry the words must be recognized to be moving in a direction separate from the jostling or lack of it which occurs within the piece.
Marianne’s words remain separate, each unwilling to group with the others except as they move in the one direction. This is even an important — or amusing — character of Miss Moore’s work.
Her work puzzles me. It is not easy to quote convincingly.
XXV
Somebody dies every four minutes
in New York State —
To hell with you and your poetry —
You will rot and be blown
through the next solar system
with the rest of the gases —
What the hell do you know about it?
AXIOMS
Do not get killed
Careful Crossing Campaign
Cross Crossings Cautiously
THE HORSES
PRANCED
black
&
white
What’s the use of sweating over
this sort of thing, Carl; here
it is all set up —
Outings in New York City
Ho for the open country
Dont’t stay shut up in hot rooms
Go to one of the Great Parks
Pelham Bay for example
It’s on Long Island Sound
with bathing, boating
tennis, baseball, golf, etc.
Acres and acres of green grass
wonderful shade trees, rippling brooks
Take the Pelham Bay Park Branch
of the Lexington Ave. (East Side)
Line and you are there in a few
minutes
Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
XXVI
The crowd at the ball game
is moved uniformly
by a spirit of uselessness
which delights them —
all the exciting detail
of the chase
and the escape, the error
the flash of genius —
all to no end save beauty
the eternal —
So in detail they, the crowd,
are beautiful
for this
to be warned against
saluted and defied —
It is alive, venemous
it smiles grimly
its words cut —
The