His face came close to hers.
âYes.â Kate held his gaze and he stood up again. âIf we assume the single wound was first, the victim was most likely standing. That wound is higher on the back and might have killed him eventually. But the other two sped up the process. The internal bleeding after the organ damage was fatal.â
Staring at her, his fingers twitched. âWhere are you going with this, Kate?â
She smiled. âDirect as ever, arenât you, Detective?â She came around the desk and stood directly behind him. She touched the middle of his back, her tone authoritative. âHereâs where the solitary wound was located.â Then, raising her arm slowly, a pen clutched in her hand, she paused for a split second before she finished with a quick stabbing motion. She touched his back again. âIs this the same spot, the one where the victim was stabbed?â
Intrigued, he shook his head. âNo, that one was higher.â
âRight. Now bend forward like before.â Again she pointed out the placement of the stab wounds on the therapist, then pretended to knife him twice more before asking him to compare the simulated locations. âDo you see the difference?â
He straightened and faced the medical examiner. âAll the wounds on the victim were higher than yours on me.â
âDo you know why?â
A man of only average height, he stood several inches over the small woman. âI think I do.â
âHow tall are you, Detective?â
âFive-Âten.â
âIâm only five-Âtwo,â she said. âYouâve got a lot of inches on me.â
Cancini followed her logic. âBut our victim had no such height advantage on his killer.â
âThatâs right. Maybe an inch or two. No more. Dr. Michael was six feet and one-Âhalf inch. I think your perp was approximately the same, maybe slightly shorter. Itâs possible, of course, that the killer might have made a conscious effort to change their height, so itâs not conclusive. But if they didnât, based on the angle and placement of the wounds, Iâm guessing your killer is in the range of five-Âten to six feet, between your height and the victimâs.â Walking back around the desk, the medical examiner sat and leaned back in her chair. âThatâs all I have.â
He had an approximate height. He knew the perp was right-Âhanded and used an ordinary butcher knife. It was circumstantial but could prove useful later. âThanks, Kate. Itâs more than I had when I came in here.â
âSure. Thatâs my job.â
Cancini, hand on the doorknob, turned back to the woman behind the desk. âCould there be any significance to the number of stab wounds?â
Twin lines appeared between her brows. âWhat do you mean?â
âCould the attacker have been angry or crazy maybe?â
âOh.â He watched her face as she made the connection between the idea of an unbalanced act or momentary insanity in the murder of the therapist. âI donât know, Detective. Iâm not an expert at motive.â
âBut you are an expert at forensics. Youâve seen cases where the attacker went a little crazy before. Is this like that?â
She hesitated. âItâs hard to say. Usually in cases of extreme psychosis or emotion, the killer will stab over and over, long after the person is dead.â
âDr. Michael was only stabbed three times.â
âIt doesnât fit the norm of extreme psychosis, but that doesnât mean it isnât. There is one other thing though.â She pushed her glasses up on her nose. âThe victim didnât suffer long. He died in a matter of minutes. Iâd have to say the murderer was quite efficient.â
âEfficient? That doesnât sound like extreme psychosis at all.â
âProbably not the kind you mean,â she said. âBut that
Ross E. Lockhart, Justin Steele
Christine Wenger
Cerise DeLand
Robert Muchamore
Jacquelyn Frank
Annie Bryant
Aimee L. Salter
Amy Tan
R. L. Stine
Gordon Van Gelder (ed)