case. Three men had gotten another man drunk with the intention of robbing him, but hadnât counted on the fact that he might resist. He was beaten unconscious and then carried into an alley and left in the trash, where he aspirated his own vomit and suffocated. The defense successfully argued that the blood alcohol percentage was so high that the amount of alcohol consumed could have killed the man by itself. The jury, not knowing that the normal blood alcohol of the victim was never much lower than toxic, found the defendants not guilty of murder.
âWe have a winner,â Carmodi announced, shocking Jack out of his reverie.
âWhat is it, doc?â Liddell asked.
Carmodi had the neck opened, exposing the laryngeal cavity. âThe carotid was severed.â He pulled the tissue back to show the detectives the flaccid carotid artery.
âHe knew what he was doing,â Liddell said.
Carmodi shook his head. âNot necessarily, Cajun. He might not have even been trying to hit the carotid.â
Jack had a question. âThen why not cut straight across the throat?â
Carmodi looked at him from under the plastic visor and shrugged.
âI meanâand Iâm just thinking out loud hereâwhy not cut across the throat? Why did he cut at an upward angle?â
Carmodi had measured with a probe earlier. âIt didnât have to be deep to get the carotid, Jack. Only about two inches, maybe less. But youâre right about the upward angle. He wouldnât have done this much damage if he had just sliced her throat straight across.â
âSo, he might have intentionally targeted the major blood vessel in the neck?â Jack asked.
Liddell saw where this was going. âYouâre the expert here, doc. Whatâs your gut tell you?â
Dr. John appeared to be weighing the evidence. Finally he checked the recorder to be sure it was turned off before saying, âI have to agree that there is some evidence that the carotid artery was the target. Whoever did this made neat work of it. Not medically trained, but knows his way around the body, Iâd say.â
âIs that just your gut talking, doc?â Jack asked.
âWhy is that so important?â Dr. John asked.
Jack shook his head. It just didnât feel right to him. âWhy kill her with one precise blow to the neck . . .â Jack began, and stared off into space as if he was visualizing the killing. âAnd then force her to the floor where he hacks her face off ?â Jack saw the confusion on their faces and explained, âThe first blow doesnât seem to be consistent with the other damage he did to the body after he killed her. So why? Why not just cut her head off? Why take her face and knock out her teeth? If he was trying to keep us from identifying her, why not take her purse and identification?â
Carmodi lifted the victimâs right arm that ended in a bloody stump where the hand should have been. âNotice anything unusual here?â
âYou want me to give you a hand?â Liddell offered, and earned a scathing look from Lilly Caskins.
Carmodi pointed to several places on the stump that were shiny. âSee this here? And here?â Jack nodded. âOur killer had some skill with a blade to do this.â He lay the arm down gently. âThe hand wasnât surgically removed. Off the record it looks like the same weapon was used to sever the hand at the wrist. And thatâs not as easy as they make it look on television.â
âAnything else?â Jack asked.
âWell, my unofficial opinion is that cause of death is exsanguination. Loss of blood. The method of death is a wound to the neck severing the carotid artery. The removal of the tongue, eyes, and hand was postmortem. She could have survived any of the other injuries, including the removal of her face, if she had found medical care immediately. The wound to the neck dropped her like a
William S. Burroughs
Stephen Coonts; Jim Defelice
Margaret Weis
Susan R. Matthews
Daniel Bergner
Karl Edward Wagner
Gil Scott Heron
Ginny Baird
Richmal Crompton
C M Gray