as he thinks he is. The same thing is just as true of civilizations â including our own.
The conviction that historyâs cycles donât apply to us is especially counterproductive in our present circumstances. Imagine that someone, confronted with a diagnosis of a life-threatening illness, insisted instead that he would live forever. For that reason, he refused either to treat the illness or make sure his family would have some means of support in the event of his death. He would be considered completely irresponsible by most people â and for good reason. This is exactly the collective situation weâre in right now. For more than three decades weâve known exactly what factors are pushing industrial society toward its own collapse, and itâs no secret what has to be done to make the transition to sustainability, but the vast majority of people in the industrial world remain unwilling to embrace the necessary changes â and nothing currently suggests that they are interested in thinking about the generations in the future who will grow up in the ruins of our society.
At this point itâs almost certainly too late to manage a transition to sustainability on a global or national scale, even if the political will to attempt it existed â which it clearly does not. Itâs not too late, though, for individuals, groups, and communities to make that transition themselves, and to do what they can to preserve essential cultural and practical knowledge for the future. The chance that todayâs political and business interests will do anything useful in our present situation is small enough that itâs probably not worth considering. Oil is to modern industrial nations what corn was to the ancient Maya. The ahauob of Washington and Wall Street, âliberalâ as well as âconservative,â have turned to the suicidal strategy of war just as their Mayan equivalents did. Fortunately, their participation in the process of transition isnât needed.
Our civilization is in the early stages of the same curve of decline and fall that so many others have followed before it, and the crises of the present â peak oil, global warming and the like â are the current versions of the historical patterns of ecological dysfunction. To judge by prior examples, we canât count on the future to bring us a better and brighter world â or even a continuation of the status quo. Instead, what most likely lies in wait for us is a long, uneven decline into a new Dark Age from which, centuries from now, the civilizations of the future will gradually emerge.
The Long Descent
Map the likely results of current trends onto a scale of human lifespans and a compelling image of the future emerges. Imagine an American woman born in 1960. She sees the gas lines of the 1970s, the short-term political gimmicks that papered over the crisis in the 1980s and 1990s, and the renewed trouble in the following decades. Periods of economic and political crisis, broken by intervals of partial recovery, shape the rest of her life. By the time she turns 70, she lives in a beleaguered, malfunctioning city where nearly half the population has no reliable access to clean water, electricity, or health care. Shantytowns spread in the shadow of skyscrapers while political and economic leaders keep insisting that things are getting better.
Her great-grandson, born in 2040, manages to avoid the smorgasbord of diseases, the pervasive violence, and the pandemic alcohol and drug abuse that claim a quarter of his generation before age 30. A lucky break gets him into a technical career, safe from military service in endless overseas wars or âpacification actionsâ against separatist guerrillas at home. His technical knowledge consists mostly of rules of thumb for effective scavenging. Cars and refrigerators are luxury items he will never own, his home lacks electricity and central heating, and his health
Diana Palmer
V. C. Andrews
Jessica Ryan
J Dawn King
Linnea Sinclair
Stephen Dobyns
jaymin eve
M. L. N. Hanover
Stormy McKnight
S. E. Kloos