The Undivided Past by David Cannadine Page A

eds.,
Reviving the English Revolution: Reflections and Elaborations on the Work of Christopher Hill
(London, 1988); R. Brenner, “Bourgeois Revolution and the Transition to Capitalism,” in A. L. Beier, D. Cannadine, and J. M. Rosenheim, eds.,
The First Modern Society: Essays in English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone
(Cambridge, 1989), pp. 271–304; Brenner,
Merchants and Revolution: Commerical Change, Political Conflict, and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550–1663
(Cambridge, 1993); G. C. Comninel,
Rethinking the French Revolution: Marxism and the Revolutionary Challenge
(London, 1987); E. J. Hobsbawm,
Echoes of the Marseillaise: Two Centuries Look Back on the French Revolution
(London, 1990); C. Jones, “Bourgeois Revolution Revivified: 1789 and Social Change,” in C. Lucas, ed.,
Rewriting the French Revolution
(Oxford, 1991), pp. 69–118; H. Heller,
The Bourgeois Revolution in France (1789–1815)
(London, 2006); R. McKibbin,
Classes and Cultures: England, 1918–1951
(Oxford, 1998); G. Eley and K. Neild, eds.,
The Future of Class in History: What’s Left of the Social?
(Ann Arbor, Mich., 2007); MacLachlan,
Rise and Fall of Revolutionary England
, pp. 298–325.
    119. Rodgers,
Age of Fracture
, p. 253.
    120. Stone,
Causes of the English Revolution
, pp. 40, 43; C. Hill,
Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution
(Oxford, 1965), p. 3; Hill, “A Bourgeois Revolution?” in J. G. A. Pocock, ed.,
Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776
(Princeton, 1980), pp. 109–39; Hill,
The Experience of Defeat: Milton and Some Contemporaries
(New York, 1984).
    121. Hobsbawm,
On History
, p. 239; Hobsbawm, “Marxist Historiography Today,” p. 187.
    122. E. P. Thompson, “The Making of a Ruling Class,”
Dissent
(Summer 1993): 380; Cannadine,
Class in Britain
, p. 16; P. Joyce,
Democratic Subjects: The Self and the Social in Nineteenth-Century England
(Cambridge, 1995), p. 2.
    123. V. Kiernan, “Revolution and Reaction, 1789–1848,”
New Left Review
, no. 19 (1963): 75.
    124. Hunt,
Engels
, p. 343; Stedman Jones, introduction to
The Communist Manifesto
, p. 143.
    125. Judt,
Ill Fares the Land
, pp. 140–42; Stedman Jones, introduction to
The Communist Manifesto
, p. 9; Hobsbawm,
On History
, pp. 237–38; Runciman,
Great Books, Bad Arguments
, pp. 115, 120; R. Samuel,
The LostWorld of British Communism
(London, 2007), p. 51; R. H. S. Crossman, in A. Koestler et al.,
The God That Failed
(London, 1965), pp. 5–6.
    126. G. Best, review of Thompson,
Making of the English Working Class, Historical Journal
8 (1965): 278; Runciman,
Great Books, Bad Arguments
, pp. 109–10. Even Victor Kiernan, who was more aware than his fellow Marxists of the importance of religion, had little time for or understanding of the importance of the nation: Kaye,
Education of Desire
, pp. 82–83, and references cited there.
    127. I. Deutscher, “The Wandering Jew as Thinker and Revolutionary,”
Universities and Left Review
4 (1958): 13; R. Miliband, “The Politics of Contemporary Capitalism,”
New Reasoner
5 (1958), p. 47; S. Hall, “A Sense of Classlessness,”
Universities and Left Review
5 (1958): 30.
    128. Hobsbawm,
Nations and Nationalism Since 1780
, esp. pp. 177–92; Hobsbawm,
On History
, pp. 5–9, 266–77; Hobsbawm, “Marxist Historiography Today,” pp. 184–85.
    129. Hunt,
Engels
, pp. 308–13; Stedman Jones, introduction to
The Communist Manifesto
, p. 4.
    130. J. W. Scott, “Women in
The Making of the English Working Class,”
in Scott,
Gender and the Politics of History
(New York, 1988), pp. 68–90; A. Clark,
The Struggle for the Breeches: Gender and the Making of the British Working Class
(London, 1995); P. A. Custer, “Reconfiguring Jemima: Gender, Work and Politics in Lancashire, 1770–1820,”
Past and Present
, no. 195 (2007): 127–58; Hobsbawm,
On History
, p. 71.

FOUR: GENDER
        1. W. Thompson,
Appeal of One-Half of the Human Race, Women, Against the Pretensions of the Other Half, Men, to Retain