The Undivided Past by David Cannadine Page B

Them in Political, and Thence in Civil and Domestic Slavery
(London, 1825; reprinted, London, 1983), pp. xxi–xxii; B. Taylor,
Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the Nineteenth Century
(New York, 1983), pp. 22–24.
        2. M. Walters,
Feminism: A Very Short Introduction
(Oxford, 2005), pp. 43–45; D. Wahrman, “ ‘Middle-Class’ Domesticity Goes Public: Gender, Class and Politics from Queen Anne to Queen Victoria,”
Journal of British Studies
32 (1993): 410–14.
        3. T. Ball, “Utilitarianism, Feminism, and the Franchise: James Mill and His Critics,”
History of Political Thought
1 (1980): 110–12.
        4. Thompson,
Appeal of One-Half of the Human Race
, pp. 39, 77.
        5. Ibid., pp. 17, 35, 53, 61, 68–69.
        6. J. W. Scott,
Gender and the Politics of History
(New York, 1988), pp. 2, 32.
        7. B. Friedan,
The Feminine Mystique
(New York, 2001 ed.), pp. 511–12; G. Greer,
The Female Eunuch
(New York, 2008 ed.), p. 131.
        8. A. D. Smith,
National Identity
(Harmondsworth, 1991), p. 4.
        9. S. de Beauvoir,
The Second Sex
(New York, 1989 ed.), p. xxv.
      10. J. W. Scott, “Fantasy Echo: History and the Construction of Identity,”
Critical Inquiry
27 (2001): 286–87.
      11. M. Dowd,
Are Men Necessary? When Sexes Collide
(New York, 2005), pp. 7, 80, 199–200.
      12. C. Stansell,
The Feminist Promise: 1792 to the Present
(New York, 2010), p. 39; L. Brizendine,
The Female Brain
(New York, 2006), pp. 7–8.
      13. The classic Aristotelian texts are reprinted in R. Agonito, ed.,
History of Ideas on Woman: A Source Book
(New York, 1977), pp. 43–54; J. English, ed.,
Sex Equality
(Engelwood Cliffs, N.J., 1977), pp. 20–31. For recent feminist attempts to “recover” Aristotle, see C. A. Freedland, ed.,
Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle
(University Park, Pa., 1998).
      14. Stansell,
Feminist Promise
, pp. 4–5.
      15. 1 Timothy 2:12–15; O. Hufton,
The Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe
, vol. 1,
1500–1800
(New York, 1996), pp. 30–33; S. Mendelson and P. Crawford,
Women in Early Modern England, 1550–1720
(Oxford, 1998), pp. 32–34.
      16. English,
Sex Equality
, pp. 42–47; Stansell,
Feminist Promise
, p. 14; J. Rendall,
The Origins of Modern Feminism: Women in Britain, France and the United States, 1780–1860
(London, 1985), pp. 7–32.
      17. T. Paine,
Rights of Man, Common Sense and Other Political Writings
(New York, 1995, ed.), p. 11; Agonito,
History of Ideas on Woman
, pp. 249–63; C. Darwin,
The Descent of Man
, in P. H. Barrett and R. B. Freeman, eds.,
The Works of Charles Darwin
(London, 1986), vol. 21, pp. 556, 564, 605, 614.
      18. Agonito,
History of Ideas on Woman
, pp. 265–69, 297–322; P. Gay,
The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud
, vol. 2,
The Tender Passion
(New York, 1986), p. 85; C. Thompson,
Psychoanalysis: Evolution and Development
(New York, 1950), pp. 131–33; S. Freud,
New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis
(New York, 1933), pp. 170ff.
      19. J. Gray,
Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus: The Definitive Guide to Relationships
(London, 1992), esp. pp. 1–5, 7, 10.
      20. S. Baron-Cohen,
The Essential Difference
(London, 2003), pp. 1–6, 78–80, 129.
      21. For similar arguments to those of Baron-Cohen (and Gray), see Brizendine,
Female Brain
; S. Pinker,
The Sexual Paradox: Men, Women and the Gender Gap
(New York, 2008).
      22. G. Greer,
The Whole Woman
(New York, 2000), pp. 70–80.
      23. Gray,
Men Are from Mars
, p. 7; A. Kessler-Harris, “Gender and Work: Possibilities for a Global Overview,” in B. Smith, ed.,
Women’s History in Global Perspective
, 3 vols. (Urbana, Ill., 2004–5), vol. 1, pp. 147–51.
      24. K. V. Thomas, “The Double Standard,”
Journal of the History of Ideas
20 (1959): 195–216.
      25. H. L. Smith,
All Men and Both Sexes: Gender, Politics and the False Universal in England, 1640–1832
(University Park,