could be her!â About another she said, âThatâs probably her!â And about the third she said, âYouâd fall in love with that one!â
Thirty seconds later
Re: !!!!!!
WHICH ONE WOULD YOU FALL IN LOVE WITH?????
Forty seconds later
Re: !!!!!!
Dear Emmi,
Thereâs absolutely no way Iâm EVER going to tell you that. Please spare yourself the effort of trying to drag it out of me. Have a nice evening. Thanks for the exciting âgame.â I really like you, Emmi!
Yours,
Leo
Twenty-five seconds later
Re: !!!!!!
The blond with the large breasts, right?
Fifty seconds later
Re: !!!!!!
Forget it, Emmi dear!
One minute later
Re: !!!!!!
An evasive answer is an answer nonetheless. The blond with the large breasts it is, then!
The following evening
Subject: A bad day
Dear Leo,
Did you have a good day today? Mine was awful. Good evening, good night.
Emmi
(By the way, when you think of Emmi now, which Emmi comes to mind? I hope you are still thinking of Emmi!)
Three and a half hours later
Re: A bad day
When I think of Emmi, I donât think of any of the three Emmis described by my sister, but of the fourth one, my one. And yes, of course Iâm still thinking about Emmi. Why didnât you have a good day? What was so awful about it? Good night, good morning.
Yours,
Leo
The following day
Subject: A good day!
Good morning. So you see, dear Leo, this is how a good day begins for me! I open my in-box and find a message from Leo Leike. Yesterday: bad day. No email from Leo. Not one. Not a single one. Not even a hint of one. What promise does a day like that hold? Leo, I need to tell you something: I think we should stop. Iâm beginning to get addicted to you. I canât spend my entire day waiting for emails from a man who turns his back on me when he meets me, who doesnât want to get to know me, who only wants me to email him, who uses my words to construct a woman of his own making, because the presence of real women probably pushes him way beyond his comfort level. I canât go on like this. Itâs unrewarding. Do you understand me, Leo?
Two hours later
Re: A good day!
O.K., I understand you. But Iâve got four questions, which I shall set out in strict accordance with the Rothner formula:
1) Do you want to get to know me in person?
2) Why?
3) Where will it lead?
4) Should your husband know about it?
Half an hour later
Re: A good day!
Re: 1) Do I want to get to know you in person? Of course I do. Personally is preferable to impersonally, donât you think?
Re: 2) Why? Iâll only know the answer to that when weâve gotten to know each other.
Re: 3) Where will it lead? It will lead to wherever it leads. And if it didnât lead there, then it shouldnât. So it will only lead to where it should lead.
Re: 4) Should my husband know about it? Iâll only know the answer to that when I know where itâs leading.
Five minutes later
Re: A good day!
So would you cheat on your husband?
One minute later
Re: A good day!
Thatâs not what I said.
Forty seconds later
Re: A good day!
Iâm inferring it.
Thirty-five seconds later
Re: A good day!
Be careful that you donât infer too much.
Two minutes later
Re: A good day!
What is it your husband canât give you?
Fifteen seconds later
Re: A good day!
Nothing. Nothing whatsoever. What gives you the impression thereâs something he canât give me?
Fifty seconds later
Re: A good day!
Iâm inferring it.
Thirty seconds later
Re: A good day!
From what are you inferring it? (Youâre beginning to get on my nerves with your language psychologistâs inference.)
Ten minutes later
Re: A good day!
Iâm inferring it from the way you lead me to understand that you want something from me. You wonât be able to say what it is until weâve met. But thereâs no doubt that you DO want something from me. Or put another way:
Rachel Brookes
Natalie Blitt
Kathi S. Barton
Louise Beech
Murray McDonald
Angie West
Mark Dunn
Victoria Paige
Elizabeth Peters
Lauren M. Roy