youâre looking for something. Letâs call it adventure. Those who go looking for adventure never find it. Am I right?
An hour and a half later
Re: A good day!
Youâre right, I am looking for something. I desperately need a priest to explain to me the definition of cheating on your husband. Or at least what a priest might imagine it to be, a priest who has never cheated, not only because he doesnât have a woman to cheat with, but also because he doesnât have a wife to cheat on, except for the Virgin Mary herself. This isnât The Thorn Birds , Leo! Iâm not looking for âadventureâ with you. I just want to see who you are. Just once I want to look my email buddy in the eye. If thatâs what you call âcheating,â then I admit that I might just be a cheat.
Twenty minutes later
Re: A good day!
But just to be sure, you wouldnât tell your husband anything.
Fifteen minutes later
Re: A good day!
Leo, I donât like it when you come off all priggish! Youâre welcome to go on like that when it concerns your own affairs, but not when it comes to mine. Being happily married doesnât mean that you have to deliver a daily report of all the people you meet. If I did that, Iâd bore Bernhard to tears.
Two minutes later
Re: A good day!
So youâd say nothing to your Bernhard about our meeting because youâre afraid it would bore him to tears?
Three minutes later
Re: A good day!
Oh, the way you write âyour Bernhard,â Leo! I canât help it that my husband has a name. But that doesnât mean that he belongs to me, or that heâs glued to my side 24/7 with me endlessly cooing âMy Bernhard!â and my hands all over him.
I donât think you have the faintest idea about marriage, Leo.
Five minutes later
Re: A good day!
Iâve not said a word about marriage, Emmi. And you still havenât answered my last question. But how did you put it recently? An evasive answer is an answer nonetheless.
Ten minutes later
Re: A good day!
Dear Leo, Letâs draw a line under this. Youâre the one who owes ME an answer to my crucial question, which Iâm happy to repeat for you: Do you want to meet me? If the answerâs yes, then letâs do it! If the answerâs no, then please tell me what all this is about, how should it carry on? Or rather, should it carry on at all?
Twenty minutes later
Re: A good day!
Why canât we just carry on writing to each other?
Two minutes later
Re: A good day!
I donât get it: he just doesnât want to get to know me! Youâre such a fuddy-duddy, Leo. Maybe Iâm the blonde with the large breasts!!!
Thirty seconds later
Re: A good day!
So?
Twenty seconds later
Re: A good day!
You could ogle them.
Thirty-five seconds later
Re: A good day!
And youâd like that, would you?
Twenty-five seconds later
Re: A good day!
Not me, you! All men like it, especially the ones who donât admit it.
Fifty seconds later
Re: A good day!
I much prefer these kinds of conversations.
Thirty seconds later
Re: A good day!
Aha! So youâre a repressed sex-chat addict after all.
Three minutes later
Re: A good day!
That was a good one to end on, Emmi. Sorry, Iâve got to go out now. I hope you have a nice evening.
Four minutes later
Re: A good day!
Twenty-eight emails between us today, Leo. And where have they got us? Nowhere. Whatâs your mantra?âdetachment. Whatâs your parting shot?âyou hope that I âhave a nice evening.â Thatâs in âMerry Christmas and a Happy New Year from Emmi Rothnerâ territory. To sum up, after a hundred emails and a professionally executed meeting-without-actually-meeting, weâre not a millimeter closer. The only thing sustaining our âinner non-acquaintanceâ is the staggering effort we devote. Leo. Leo. Leo. What a shame, what a terrible shame.
One minute later
Re: A good
Rod Serling
Elizabeth Eagan-Cox
Marina Dyachenko, Sergey Dyachenko
Daniel Casey
Ronan Cray
Tanita S. Davis
Jeff Brown
Melissa de La Cruz
Kathi Appelt
Karen Young